1 00:01:40,133 --> 00:01:41,933 Funding for “To the Contrary,” 2 00:01:41,933 --> 00:01:45,666 provided by: 3 00:01:51,433 --> 00:01:53,533 Coming up on “To the Contrary”: 4 00:01:53,533 --> 00:01:56,700 Gender is one of the defining fault lines of our politics 5 00:01:56,700 --> 00:01:57,066 today. 6 00:01:57,633 --> 00:01:58,900 You know, one of the starkest contrasts 7 00:01:58,900 --> 00:02:02,233 right now is when you talk about “cat lady” 8 00:02:02,233 --> 00:02:05,233 and some of the comments that Trump and Vance make. 9 00:02:05,233 --> 00:02:08,233 Women find it very disrespectful. 10 00:02:27,066 --> 00:02:28,633 Hello, I'm Bonnie Erbé. 11 00:02:28,633 --> 00:02:31,800 Welcome to “To the Contrary,” a weekly discussion of news 12 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,866 and social trends from diverse perspectives. 13 00:02:35,133 --> 00:02:37,433 We are in the final month of the campaign. 14 00:02:37,433 --> 00:02:41,900 And women voters and issues affecting women of all races 15 00:02:41,900 --> 00:02:45,500 and of all diverse types are dominating the campaign. 16 00:02:45,866 --> 00:02:47,600 With us to sort through the noise 17 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:50,700 and help everyone understand what lies ahead, 18 00:02:50,700 --> 00:02:52,166 are Democratic pollster, 19 00:02:52,166 --> 00:02:55,633 Linda Lake of Lake Research, and Amanda Iovino, 20 00:02:55,866 --> 00:02:59,633 Republican pollster of WPA Intel. 21 00:02:59,633 --> 00:03:02,166 Welcome to you, both. Thank you so much for having us. 22 00:03:02,166 --> 00:03:04,366 And it's great to be on here with Amanda. 23 00:03:04,366 --> 00:03:06,500 Yeah, it's great to be on here. Thank you. 24 00:03:06,500 --> 00:03:07,666 All right. Terrific. 25 00:03:07,666 --> 00:03:10,900 And let's just jump right in by asking you 26 00:03:11,166 --> 00:03:14,100 how big an issue is gender in this campaign. 27 00:03:14,100 --> 00:03:16,800 The coalition that Harris has put together 28 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:18,966 is different than the Biden coalition. 29 00:03:18,966 --> 00:03:21,233 There is a bigger gender gap. 30 00:03:21,233 --> 00:03:23,700 She has created an incredible enthusiasm 31 00:03:23,700 --> 00:03:26,966 among pro-abortion voters, even more than 32 00:03:28,133 --> 00:03:28,700 Joe Biden 33 00:03:29,100 --> 00:03:31,700 had done, registering a lot of young people, 34 00:03:32,433 --> 00:03:34,966 registering a lot of women of color, 35 00:03:34,966 --> 00:03:37,466 so the gender of the voters and the gender 36 00:03:37,466 --> 00:03:38,633 of the issues, i.e. 37 00:03:38,633 --> 00:03:40,966 abortion, although I would argue abortion is a man 38 00:03:40,966 --> 00:03:43,400 and a woman's issue, and the gender of the candidate 39 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:44,966 are all making a big difference. 40 00:03:44,966 --> 00:03:47,966 Yeah, I think from a voter perspective, it's a major issue, 41 00:03:47,966 --> 00:03:50,233 you know, along with education. 42 00:03:50,233 --> 00:03:52,200 And of course, partisanship. Gender is one of 43 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:55,166 the defining fault lines of our politics today. 44 00:03:56,066 --> 00:03:59,100 Gender determines how campaigns, news 45 00:03:59,100 --> 00:04:01,166 and even issues are perceived. 46 00:04:01,166 --> 00:04:02,933 But what's been interesting is 47 00:04:02,933 --> 00:04:06,000 that gender is less of an issue within the campaigns itself, 48 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,100 particularly relative to 2016 and even 2020. 49 00:04:10,433 --> 00:04:12,066 On the Democratic side, certainly, 50 00:04:12,066 --> 00:04:14,366 I think the media has learned some of its lessons 51 00:04:14,366 --> 00:04:16,233 and Harris has as well. 52 00:04:17,800 --> 00:04:19,900 Frankly, what Republican women 53 00:04:19,900 --> 00:04:22,933 candidates have frankly learned or knew intuitively 54 00:04:22,933 --> 00:04:27,366 that playing the gender identity game doesn't help with voters 55 00:04:27,366 --> 00:04:29,233 as much as they might want it to. That 56 00:04:29,233 --> 00:04:31,733 really focusing on the issues is what voters want to hear. 57 00:04:31,733 --> 00:04:34,733 Kamala Harris has not been raising gender, 58 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,700 really, or race for that matter very much, if at all. 59 00:04:39,300 --> 00:04:41,500 Is that the best way for her to campaign? 60 00:04:41,500 --> 00:04:43,500 Trump keeps bringing it up. 61 00:04:43,500 --> 00:04:45,300 I think that it is the smartest way. 62 00:04:45,300 --> 00:04:48,333 I think it's a new generation of leadership. 63 00:04:48,333 --> 00:04:50,066 It's a new generation of feminism, 64 00:04:50,066 --> 00:04:50,933 which, believe it or not, 65 00:04:51,266 --> 00:04:53,333 is still a very popular word with people. 66 00:04:53,333 --> 00:04:56,333 And two-thirds of women describe themselves as feminism. 67 00:04:57,033 --> 00:04:59,933 But we don't have to be told she's a woman candidate. 68 00:04:59,933 --> 00:05:01,266 We can see she's a woman candidate. 69 00:05:01,266 --> 00:05:04,100 We don't have to be told she's a woman of color. 70 00:05:04,100 --> 00:05:05,233 We can see that. 71 00:05:05,233 --> 00:05:09,033 And her personal story and her agenda reflect 72 00:05:09,300 --> 00:05:11,733 some of these issues. She's made much more prominent, 73 00:05:11,733 --> 00:05:13,900 for example, the caregiving agenda. 74 00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:18,033 She's very, very comfortable and very identified with freedom 75 00:05:18,033 --> 00:05:20,400 to have an abortion, to make your own decisions, 76 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:22,100 personal, medical decisions. 77 00:05:22,100 --> 00:05:25,033 So she's telling it in an integrated way. 78 00:05:25,033 --> 00:05:27,300 It is part and parcel of who she is. 79 00:05:27,300 --> 00:05:30,133 She doesn't need to wave a banner around. 80 00:05:30,133 --> 00:05:32,733 It's something that is evident between the two candidates. 81 00:05:32,733 --> 00:05:34,733 It's not something that necessarily needs to be said. 82 00:05:34,733 --> 00:05:38,633 And like I mentioned, it's something that Republican women 83 00:05:38,633 --> 00:05:41,200 candidates have been dealing with for a long time. 84 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,666 And it's nice to kind of see both sides 85 00:05:43,666 --> 00:05:45,200 kind of coming to the same conclusion. 86 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:48,100 When you interview men versus women, 87 00:05:48,100 --> 00:05:49,900 do you talk to them differently? 88 00:05:49,900 --> 00:05:53,200 Do they respond to different issues 89 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:57,366 or even emotional themes differently? 90 00:05:57,366 --> 00:05:59,633 We ask them mostly the same questions. 91 00:05:59,633 --> 00:06:00,266 It's very rare 92 00:06:00,566 --> 00:06:02,066 that we'll ask them different questions, 93 00:06:02,066 --> 00:06:03,366 but how they respond to the questions 94 00:06:03,366 --> 00:06:05,200 is definitely different. 95 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:07,333 The messages that they react to is different. 96 00:06:07,333 --> 00:06:10,300 The issues that they highlight are often different. 97 00:06:10,300 --> 00:06:11,933 The language that they use to respond 98 00:06:11,933 --> 00:06:15,566 when we ask them an open ended question is different. 99 00:06:15,566 --> 00:06:17,266 And all of that is kind of factored 100 00:06:17,266 --> 00:06:19,566 into our analysis and the strategic 101 00:06:19,566 --> 00:06:21,566 kind of insight that we provide to the campaigns 102 00:06:21,566 --> 00:06:22,700 then is different. 103 00:06:22,700 --> 00:06:24,700 But are there, before we get to Celinda, 104 00:06:24,700 --> 00:06:26,266 are there words, Amanda, 105 00:06:26,266 --> 00:06:29,533 that you would use with polling women that elicit 106 00:06:29,533 --> 00:06:32,166 a better response from your perspective 107 00:06:32,166 --> 00:06:33,266 that you should use 108 00:06:33,266 --> 00:06:35,833 and those that you shouldn't use because they don't? 109 00:06:35,833 --> 00:06:39,333 When I poll, I typically look for what a candidate is going 110 00:06:39,333 --> 00:06:42,566 to say and use the words that the candidate is going to 111 00:06:42,566 --> 00:06:45,700 want to use to talk to voters and see how voters respond 112 00:06:45,700 --> 00:06:47,566 to that, as opposed to looking 113 00:06:47,566 --> 00:06:50,633 to see what a voter of either gender is going to want to hear. 114 00:06:50,633 --> 00:06:53,100 Sometimes people will respond differently, 115 00:06:53,100 --> 00:06:55,233 whether they're being interviewed by a man or a woman. 116 00:06:56,033 --> 00:06:59,000 So, for example, on the abortion issue, women 117 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,333 who are talking to women before the Dobbs decision 118 00:07:02,666 --> 00:07:06,033 were more pro-choice than women who were talking to men. 119 00:07:06,733 --> 00:07:08,233 Which is exactly the opposite 120 00:07:08,233 --> 00:07:09,800 of what a lot of us thought it would be. 121 00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:12,400 And when we went back and asked people 122 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:15,366 why they had those attitudes, they said, “Well, 123 00:07:15,366 --> 00:07:16,000 when I'm talking 124 00:07:16,466 --> 00:07:19,566 to women I feel like I can express my ambivalence. 125 00:07:19,900 --> 00:07:20,466 I can say 126 00:07:21,066 --> 00:07:23,533 maybe I wouldn't get an abortion or I worry about this or 127 00:07:23,766 --> 00:07:25,233 I'm conflicted by this. 128 00:07:25,233 --> 00:07:27,266 When I'm talking to a man, I don't want him 129 00:07:27,266 --> 00:07:28,800 to think it's his decision, 130 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:31,700 so I just tell him I'm pro-choice.” 131 00:07:31,700 --> 00:07:34,166 So there are some differences like that. 132 00:07:34,166 --> 00:07:36,033 You know, one of the starkest contrasts 133 00:07:36,033 --> 00:07:39,300 right now is when you talk about “cat lady” 134 00:07:39,300 --> 00:07:42,666 and some of the comments that Trump and Vance make, women 135 00:07:42,666 --> 00:07:44,800 find it very disrespectful and divisive. 136 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:45,766 They don't like it. 137 00:07:45,766 --> 00:07:47,466 They don't want their daughters to hear it. 138 00:07:47,466 --> 00:07:49,833 Men are like, “Well, I don't like it. 139 00:07:49,833 --> 00:07:51,133 But that's Trump being Trump. 140 00:07:51,133 --> 00:07:53,966 Sometimes Trump doesn't know when to shut up. 141 00:07:53,966 --> 00:07:57,233 He should just not talk because his policies are good, 142 00:07:57,233 --> 00:07:58,366 but his rhetoric isnt.” 143 00:07:58,366 --> 00:08:00,700 So you do get gender differences 144 00:08:00,700 --> 00:08:02,800 in terms of responses to different things 145 00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:04,200 that candidates will be saying. 146 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:05,733 How does that play 147 00:08:05,733 --> 00:08:08,633 with Republican voters who are supporting Trump? 148 00:08:08,633 --> 00:08:12,666 The fact that the women, particularly female Republicans, 149 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:15,100 that they don't want their daughters hearing 150 00:08:15,100 --> 00:08:17,066 about what he's saying and what he's doing, 151 00:08:17,066 --> 00:08:19,300 what do evangelical women think about this? 152 00:08:19,300 --> 00:08:19,666 I think a. 153 00:08:20,366 --> 00:08:24,066 Lot of that is kind of prebaked into who Trump is. 154 00:08:24,066 --> 00:08:26,200 Voters, especially Republican voters, 155 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:29,133 are very much focused on Trump's policies. 156 00:08:30,100 --> 00:08:30,866 And they 157 00:08:31,133 --> 00:08:33,733 believe strongly that the four years under Trump 158 00:08:33,733 --> 00:08:36,633 were significantly better, especially economically, 159 00:08:36,633 --> 00:08:38,333 than they have been under the last four years 160 00:08:38,333 --> 00:08:40,200 with the Biden-Harris administration. 161 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:42,666 And that's really what they're looking forward to 162 00:08:42,666 --> 00:08:45,100 under a second Trump administration. 163 00:08:45,100 --> 00:08:48,433 So the rhetoric, it kind of goes back to, 164 00:08:48,433 --> 00:08:51,366 you know, the 2016 campaign, they didn't. 165 00:08:51,366 --> 00:08:52,833 There are a lot of Republican voters 166 00:08:52,833 --> 00:08:55,400 that don't necessarily like the way 167 00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:57,933 Trump talks about things, but there are a lot of voters 168 00:08:57,933 --> 00:09:02,100 that for whom the way Trump talks about issues 169 00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:06,066 is a majority of his appeal, especially for voters 170 00:09:06,266 --> 00:09:09,166 without college degrees, men without college degrees. 171 00:09:09,166 --> 00:09:11,233 They like that he just tells it like it is. 172 00:09:11,233 --> 00:09:12,233 And that is a strong, 173 00:09:12,233 --> 00:09:15,500 his authenticity is a big part of his appeal. 174 00:09:15,500 --> 00:09:16,266 The media have 175 00:09:16,566 --> 00:09:20,233 given a lot of place, Celinda, to the Project 2025 176 00:09:20,233 --> 00:09:22,800 agenda put forward by the Heritage Foundation. 177 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:24,666 But using all staff, 178 00:09:24,666 --> 00:09:28,200 former staffers and people close to former President Trump. 179 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,433 Are women scared at all by that agenda? 180 00:09:31,433 --> 00:09:32,100 So originally, 181 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:35,300 people had no idea what the 2025 agenda was, 182 00:09:35,300 --> 00:09:36,933 and I really credit the Democrats 183 00:09:36,933 --> 00:09:38,533 and their allies for defining it. 184 00:09:38,533 --> 00:09:41,766 And now you have 50 some odd percent of the voters 185 00:09:41,766 --> 00:09:43,200 who feel negatively toward it, 186 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:46,833 and only about 11% of the voters who feel positive about it. 187 00:09:47,500 --> 00:09:51,233 Women were flabbergasted that it included more 188 00:09:51,233 --> 00:09:52,566 action on abortion. 189 00:09:52,566 --> 00:09:55,333 They thought, haven't you done enough damage already? 190 00:09:55,333 --> 00:09:56,633 But you're going after birth control, 191 00:09:56,633 --> 00:10:00,000 medication, abortion, criminalizing providers? 192 00:10:00,866 --> 00:10:03,333 Women also disliked intensely 193 00:10:03,333 --> 00:10:06,333 the cutting of children's programs and Social Security. 194 00:10:06,633 --> 00:10:09,633 They disliked doing away with the Department of Education 195 00:10:09,933 --> 00:10:12,366 and women, one of the biggest 196 00:10:12,366 --> 00:10:13,000 Are you talking 197 00:10:13,466 --> 00:10:17,266 talking Democratic and Republican women or undecided 198 00:10:17,266 --> 00:10:17,933 voters? 199 00:10:18,133 --> 00:10:21,000 Republican women but Democratic women 200 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:23,900 and independent and swing women. 201 00:10:23,900 --> 00:10:27,800 So we've done a good job of defining 2025 202 00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:30,866 agenda in a way that alienates women. 203 00:10:30,866 --> 00:10:33,266 The hardest thing has been to convince people 204 00:10:33,266 --> 00:10:36,466 that Trump was really for it 205 00:10:36,466 --> 00:10:40,266 and that Trump was behind it, and that has 206 00:10:40,266 --> 00:10:41,400 been a bit of a struggle. 207 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:44,266 But I think that echoing as you did, that 208 00:10:44,266 --> 00:10:47,266 his aides and his advisers wrote a lot of it. 209 00:10:47,266 --> 00:10:50,533 People think this is the MAGA agenda, and he's following 210 00:10:50,533 --> 00:10:54,300 the MAGA agenda now, which they don't necessarily like. 211 00:10:54,300 --> 00:10:56,200 So it's been a big negative. 212 00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:57,700 The biggest challenge 213 00:10:57,700 --> 00:11:00,766 that the Democrats face, that the vice president face 214 00:11:00,766 --> 00:11:02,133 is getting more credibility 215 00:11:02,133 --> 00:11:04,933 and increasing credibility on the economy. 216 00:11:04,933 --> 00:11:06,300 And just like she gave 217 00:11:06,300 --> 00:11:09,533 speeches in the past, she's been emphasizing her proposals. 218 00:11:09,833 --> 00:11:11,166 She knows that, too. 219 00:11:11,166 --> 00:11:12,566 But that's the biggest challenge 220 00:11:12,566 --> 00:11:15,166 for us, for male and female voters. 221 00:11:15,166 --> 00:11:16,900 Now, what do you think the biggest challenges 222 00:11:16,900 --> 00:11:19,833 for Trump with male and female voters, Amanda. Getting 223 00:11:19,833 --> 00:11:22,966 that enthusiasm up among men 18 to 54. 224 00:11:23,500 --> 00:11:24,833 That's been lagging a little bit. 225 00:11:24,833 --> 00:11:27,900 And that's, I think, why you're seeing him kind of go out 226 00:11:27,900 --> 00:11:31,266 and talking to different social media influencers. 227 00:11:32,666 --> 00:11:34,833 That's one of the big keys. 228 00:11:34,833 --> 00:11:36,133 And then reaching out to women, 229 00:11:36,133 --> 00:11:39,133 which I think he is doing, perhaps, 230 00:11:40,166 --> 00:11:43,466 in his own way and artfully, but really emphasizing 231 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:45,833 that safety elements 232 00:11:45,833 --> 00:11:49,100 and, of course, the economic messages and really emphasizing, 233 00:11:49,700 --> 00:11:50,300 how much better 234 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:52,533 the economy was under him and how much 235 00:11:52,533 --> 00:11:54,966 how poorly it's been under the Biden-Harris administration. 236 00:11:54,966 --> 00:11:58,266 How do you think Republican women have responded to him 237 00:11:58,266 --> 00:12:02,666 recently, telling them that he would be their protector, 238 00:12:03,833 --> 00:12:06,166 and that he that once he got back 239 00:12:06,166 --> 00:12:09,233 into the White House, if he does, 240 00:12:09,233 --> 00:12:12,433 that women wouldn't even be thinking about abortion? 241 00:12:12,433 --> 00:12:16,200 I kind of, I was a little confused by that, to be honest. 242 00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:20,033 You know what he was trying to say in his own way, 243 00:12:20,033 --> 00:12:23,033 was that his economic and immigration and safety 244 00:12:23,033 --> 00:12:26,600 policies are clearly better for women than Harris'. 245 00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:29,866 And that these issues are just as much women's issues 246 00:12:29,866 --> 00:12:30,633 as abortion. 247 00:12:31,866 --> 00:12:32,700 You know, could he have 248 00:12:32,700 --> 00:12:35,800 said it more like a typical politician? 249 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:37,700 More rehearsed, of course. 250 00:12:37,700 --> 00:12:40,033 But this is Donald Trump that we're talking about. 251 00:12:40,033 --> 00:12:43,066 And, frankly, his inability to be anything except who 252 00:12:43,066 --> 00:12:46,066 he is is part of his appeal. 253 00:12:46,300 --> 00:12:48,566 I think the segment of voters that are still reachable 254 00:12:48,566 --> 00:12:49,766 by his campaign, 255 00:12:49,766 --> 00:12:52,033 who haven't made up his mind, knew exactly 256 00:12:52,033 --> 00:12:54,866 what he was talking about and understood everything. 257 00:12:54,866 --> 00:12:57,400 What do you both think the down ballot 258 00:12:57,400 --> 00:13:00,566 effect of each of the candidates is going to be starting 259 00:13:00,566 --> 00:13:01,833 with you, Amanda, 260 00:13:01,833 --> 00:13:05,400 though on Republican Senate candidates, on House 261 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:08,100 candidates and gubernatorial candidates, 262 00:13:08,100 --> 00:13:09,100 how's that going to work? 263 00:13:09,100 --> 00:13:11,966 It's very much a campaign by campaign issue. 264 00:13:11,966 --> 00:13:14,966 I think there are some Senate candidates, especially, 265 00:13:14,966 --> 00:13:16,966 who have been able to define themselves, 266 00:13:17,933 --> 00:13:20,133 separately from the presidential, 267 00:13:20,133 --> 00:13:23,233 and those will likely have 268 00:13:24,566 --> 00:13:26,600 Republican candidates might be able to overperform 269 00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:29,933 Democrats might be able to overperform by a point or two. 270 00:13:30,300 --> 00:13:33,300 Incumbency will definitely matter there as well. 271 00:13:33,700 --> 00:13:35,933 And House candidates will be the same way, 272 00:13:35,933 --> 00:13:37,966 just to probably a slightly lesser effect. 273 00:13:37,966 --> 00:13:40,600 There's a lot of talk or there was about 274 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,733 the gubernatorial candidate in North Carolina, Robinson 275 00:13:43,733 --> 00:13:46,900 dragging Trump down. 276 00:13:46,900 --> 00:13:50,566 Did you think that's what was going to happen if he stayed on? 277 00:13:50,566 --> 00:13:53,566 It did look to be the case among independents, 278 00:13:53,833 --> 00:13:57,166 but in some initial polling back in August. 279 00:13:57,166 --> 00:14:01,466 But there's plenty of time for things to change. 280 00:14:01,466 --> 00:14:02,700 And I think it's been pretty clear 281 00:14:02,700 --> 00:14:05,700 that Trump has kind of denounced him and 282 00:14:05,900 --> 00:14:08,233 tried to put as much separation 283 00:14:08,233 --> 00:14:10,700 between himself and that candidate as possible. 284 00:14:10,700 --> 00:14:11,933 Well, I think that there 285 00:14:11,933 --> 00:14:14,300 and the Robinson case is a good example. 286 00:14:14,300 --> 00:14:16,900 There's the Trump effect on down ballot races. 287 00:14:16,900 --> 00:14:20,866 And then there's the down ballot effect on Trump. 288 00:14:20,866 --> 00:14:22,600 There are some doozy candidates 289 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:25,533 that have been nominated in these Republican primaries. 290 00:14:25,533 --> 00:14:27,066 It's really hard right now 291 00:14:27,066 --> 00:14:29,400 for some of the more mainstream Republicans. 292 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:30,300 It's hard for women, 293 00:14:30,300 --> 00:14:32,200 and Amanda is an expert on this, 294 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,100 to get nominated in the primaries. 295 00:14:34,100 --> 00:14:38,000 And so you have some of these very flawed candidates emerging. 296 00:14:38,366 --> 00:14:41,366 And Trump will initially endorse him and then have to, 297 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:45,100 you know, separate himself from these candidates. 298 00:14:45,100 --> 00:14:48,733 I think the other impact that Trump and Harris have 299 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:50,966 are who they're mobilizing, 300 00:14:50,966 --> 00:14:53,500 because if they're bringing in candidates, 301 00:14:53,500 --> 00:14:56,466 if they're bringing in new voters, those voters, 302 00:14:56,466 --> 00:14:59,100 may just vote down the ticket 303 00:14:59,100 --> 00:15:02,166 and send Trump or Harris, his or her team. 304 00:15:02,166 --> 00:15:04,533 So I think that's a big impact. 305 00:15:04,533 --> 00:15:07,733 And then the agenda that they said, certainly, 306 00:15:08,300 --> 00:15:11,833 Trump being so forceful on the economy 307 00:15:13,300 --> 00:15:14,133 has meant a lot 308 00:15:14,500 --> 00:15:17,133 of Democrats have had to address weaknesses on the economy. 309 00:15:17,966 --> 00:15:20,266 The fact that Harris is so strong on abortion 310 00:15:20,266 --> 00:15:22,600 have meant that a lot of candidates who weren't planning 311 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:25,066 to have a whole campaign talking about abortion 312 00:15:25,066 --> 00:15:27,233 have had to answer that issue. 313 00:15:27,233 --> 00:15:30,466 And, for example, in the Tester-Sheehy race in Montana, 314 00:15:31,066 --> 00:15:32,866 there's an initiative on the ballot. 315 00:15:32,866 --> 00:15:33,633 And it's 316 00:15:34,133 --> 00:15:36,633 a very clear distinction because Tester said, “I vote yes.” 317 00:15:36,633 --> 00:15:38,366 Sheehy said he'll vote no. 318 00:15:38,366 --> 00:15:39,566 And it's been a struggle. 319 00:15:39,566 --> 00:15:41,133 It's been one of the things that's gained 320 00:15:41,133 --> 00:15:44,266 some points back for Tester because people are like, 321 00:15:44,266 --> 00:15:46,700 “This is in our Constitution, we like this.” 322 00:15:46,700 --> 00:15:49,033 And so that has the issue, 323 00:15:49,033 --> 00:15:52,200 agenda has seeped down to some of the other candidates. 324 00:15:52,766 --> 00:15:56,300 I do think one of the other factors here is, because 325 00:15:57,266 --> 00:15:58,400 some of these swing voters 326 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:01,466 this year are college educated voters, 327 00:16:01,766 --> 00:16:04,766 thinking specifically about do places like Minnesota, 328 00:16:04,966 --> 00:16:07,800 where the vice presidential nominee 329 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:09,333 on the Democratic side 330 00:16:09,333 --> 00:16:13,366 is from, there are a lot of swing voters 331 00:16:13,366 --> 00:16:16,366 who might lean towards voting for the Democrats 332 00:16:16,366 --> 00:16:17,700 on the top of the ticket. 333 00:16:17,700 --> 00:16:20,566 But frankly, the last, you know, couple of years 334 00:16:20,566 --> 00:16:23,666 under Walz, he's really raised their taxes by a lot. 335 00:16:24,533 --> 00:16:25,566 And they might 336 00:16:25,566 --> 00:16:26,433 when they're looking at kind 337 00:16:26,433 --> 00:16:28,666 of the state races down the ballot, 338 00:16:28,666 --> 00:16:30,700 might be leaning towards splitting their ticket. 339 00:16:30,700 --> 00:16:32,266 And there's I think 340 00:16:32,266 --> 00:16:33,866 when you're having more of these swing 341 00:16:33,866 --> 00:16:36,033 voters be college educated voters, 342 00:16:36,033 --> 00:16:37,100 they're potentially 343 00:16:37,100 --> 00:16:39,233 more likely to be looking to split their tickets, 344 00:16:39,233 --> 00:16:40,300 especially when you're looking 345 00:16:40,300 --> 00:16:42,133 at a federal versus a state race. 346 00:16:42,133 --> 00:16:46,166 When we've tested, by the way, Bonnie, to the 2025 agenda, 347 00:16:46,700 --> 00:16:49,433 that's something that has coattails to. 348 00:16:49,433 --> 00:16:52,400 And so we found, Amanda is raising a really good point, 349 00:16:52,733 --> 00:16:56,200 that when we found that, we can say, you know, that 350 00:16:56,666 --> 00:16:58,900 Trump is for this and the Senate candidate, 351 00:16:58,900 --> 00:17:01,100 the MAGA Republican Senate candidates for this. 352 00:17:01,100 --> 00:17:01,566 And people 353 00:17:01,566 --> 00:17:02,266 think, “Well, 354 00:17:02,466 --> 00:17:04,033 I might vote for Trump for other reasons, 355 00:17:04,033 --> 00:17:05,600 but then I'm going to have to balance that vote 356 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:09,100 by sending a Democratic senator who's opposed to 2025.” 357 00:17:09,433 --> 00:17:10,900 So there is some balancing 358 00:17:10,900 --> 00:17:14,033 going on in the voters minds, particularly these last, 359 00:17:14,733 --> 00:17:17,800 undecided voters who aren't that rooted in partisanship. 360 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:19,800 Tell me how polling has changed. 361 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:24,133 I'll get back to particular topics in the campaign, but 362 00:17:24,466 --> 00:17:26,500 as I understood it, 363 00:17:26,500 --> 00:17:29,500 because so few people have home phones anymore 364 00:17:29,800 --> 00:17:31,433 and most everybody's on cell 365 00:17:31,433 --> 00:17:33,500 and you can't get cell phone numbers. 366 00:17:33,500 --> 00:17:34,966 How are pollsters 367 00:17:34,966 --> 00:17:37,933 making sure that they're getting a representative sample 368 00:17:37,933 --> 00:17:39,800 the way they used to be able to do 369 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:41,800 by looking up a person's phone number 370 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,833 and seeing where they lived and maybe even looking up 371 00:17:44,833 --> 00:17:45,766 voting record. 372 00:17:45,766 --> 00:17:47,666 Well, one thing I would correct is 373 00:17:47,666 --> 00:17:51,433 we can get a hold of cell phone numbers and we can buy. 374 00:17:51,433 --> 00:17:54,166 There are huge databases of cell phone numbers. 375 00:17:54,166 --> 00:17:55,566 There are vendors who match 376 00:17:55,566 --> 00:17:58,633 cell phones to the voting files so we can get your cell phone. 377 00:17:58,966 --> 00:18:02,033 Although I hope in saying that we don't shut that down 378 00:18:02,033 --> 00:18:05,033 because the minute I avoid thinking because it's no way, 379 00:18:05,466 --> 00:18:08,466 that polling will survive, but we try to reach them. 380 00:18:08,466 --> 00:18:11,800 We still reach 20% on landlines. 381 00:18:12,433 --> 00:18:14,866 Mostly seniors and rural voters. 382 00:18:14,866 --> 00:18:16,600 We reach you, we try to reach you 383 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:20,966 on your cell phone, we text you, and we also do online polling. 384 00:18:20,966 --> 00:18:24,466 So we're trying to reach you in multiple ways, multiple times, 385 00:18:24,700 --> 00:18:25,833 multiple days. 386 00:18:25,833 --> 00:18:28,300 But it is hard to reach people. 387 00:18:28,300 --> 00:18:30,266 And the response rates have gone way down. 388 00:18:30,266 --> 00:18:32,700 And it always makes the pollsters on either 389 00:18:32,700 --> 00:18:34,333 side of the aisle very nervous. 390 00:18:34,333 --> 00:18:36,666 Yeah, I will say it's gotten, 391 00:18:36,666 --> 00:18:38,700 I think, more interesting that we can reach people, 392 00:18:38,700 --> 00:18:41,700 especially through text in various times of day. 393 00:18:42,333 --> 00:18:44,833 We used to, you know, only call during dinner time 394 00:18:44,833 --> 00:18:47,833 and get hung up on because for those reasons. 395 00:18:48,100 --> 00:18:49,400 But now we can reach out. 396 00:18:49,400 --> 00:18:50,466 And in different times of day, 397 00:18:50,466 --> 00:18:51,933 people are on different schedules 398 00:18:51,933 --> 00:18:54,966 and I think Celinda and I probably both miss, 399 00:18:54,966 --> 00:18:56,200 you know, some of the days of Covid 400 00:18:56,200 --> 00:18:58,633 when it was very easy to get people on the phone 401 00:18:58,633 --> 00:19:01,500 because everyone was a lot of people were home during the day 402 00:19:01,500 --> 00:19:03,900 and begging to talk to anybody, even pollsters. 403 00:19:05,266 --> 00:19:06,166 Right, exactly. 404 00:19:06,466 --> 00:19:09,166 It was lonely spending all those months at home, wasn't it? 405 00:19:09,433 --> 00:19:13,033 Well, but what about, making sure, 406 00:19:13,033 --> 00:19:16,033 you know, you said you can buy, 407 00:19:16,033 --> 00:19:19,333 you can buy cell phone numbers, you can buy down to the zip 408 00:19:19,333 --> 00:19:21,133 code and get all kinds 409 00:19:21,133 --> 00:19:23,966 of voting information on the people you're calling. 410 00:19:23,966 --> 00:19:27,666 But how do you make sure, for example, that you're 411 00:19:27,666 --> 00:19:32,366 not oversampling one kind of voter versus another? 412 00:19:32,366 --> 00:19:33,300 I ask this 413 00:19:33,300 --> 00:19:35,633 because I saw a poll most recently, 414 00:19:35,633 --> 00:19:38,200 and it was actually an online poll, 415 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:40,533 and I wonder how much these polls are being used 416 00:19:40,533 --> 00:19:42,233 and how they're being used. 417 00:19:42,233 --> 00:19:46,166 But an online poll that was very that showed, 418 00:19:47,566 --> 00:19:50,100 Trump up way higher 419 00:19:50,100 --> 00:19:54,600 than he had been in any recent survey by Quinnipiac or 420 00:19:54,866 --> 00:19:56,533 or Ipsos or, 421 00:19:56,533 --> 00:19:59,533 you know, Gallup or any of the established pollsters. 422 00:19:59,766 --> 00:20:03,733 So is there something going wrong with online polls 423 00:20:03,733 --> 00:20:06,066 or are they just getting people to respond 424 00:20:06,066 --> 00:20:10,133 and not seeing, what their proclivity is, 425 00:20:10,133 --> 00:20:11,300 politically speaking? 426 00:20:11,300 --> 00:20:14,666 It very much depends on how the online poll was conducted, 427 00:20:14,666 --> 00:20:19,833 which panel they used and how they collected the data. 428 00:20:20,833 --> 00:20:22,600 Often when we're using online 429 00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:27,366 panels, it's a blend of opt-ins. 430 00:20:28,066 --> 00:20:31,233 And we're also sometimes blending it with texting 431 00:20:31,233 --> 00:20:34,233 and calling and kind of whenever you're 432 00:20:34,566 --> 00:20:37,566 mixing your methods, you're probably getting a 433 00:20:37,900 --> 00:20:40,066 group of people from a bunch of different, 434 00:20:40,066 --> 00:20:42,666 different ways and kind of sampling 435 00:20:42,666 --> 00:20:44,966 from a bunch of different methods and evening out 436 00:20:44,966 --> 00:20:47,066 any problems with one particular method. 437 00:20:47,066 --> 00:20:51,133 And we have, we established strata and quotas like we 438 00:20:51,466 --> 00:20:52,900 estimate how many people will be 439 00:20:52,900 --> 00:20:55,500 African American, how many people will be women? 440 00:20:55,500 --> 00:20:57,900 And I would imagine that poll that you saw 441 00:20:57,900 --> 00:21:01,033 might have had majority men, for example. 442 00:21:01,033 --> 00:21:04,133 One of the things that really irritates us 443 00:21:04,133 --> 00:21:08,200 as pollsters is 85% of our polls are never public. 444 00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:12,133 And there are some very fine public polls, as you said. 445 00:21:12,133 --> 00:21:14,666 And there are some really sloppy ones. 446 00:21:14,666 --> 00:21:16,266 And that's why the averaging 447 00:21:16,266 --> 00:21:19,266 is a little bit of your safety against that. 448 00:21:19,533 --> 00:21:21,900 We also have to figure out what the turnout model is. 449 00:21:21,900 --> 00:21:22,866 And in our firm 450 00:21:24,133 --> 00:21:26,866 we often estimate two different turnout models. 451 00:21:26,866 --> 00:21:29,633 What if we get a Harris surge? This is what the vote will be. 452 00:21:29,633 --> 00:21:31,066 What if we get a Trump surge? 453 00:21:31,066 --> 00:21:32,700 This is what the vote will be. 454 00:21:32,700 --> 00:21:34,266 What if it's a traditional electorate? 455 00:21:34,266 --> 00:21:36,166 So we're trying to understand 456 00:21:36,166 --> 00:21:39,966 and protect ourselves against deviation like that. 457 00:21:40,233 --> 00:21:41,733 And we stratified by region. 458 00:21:41,733 --> 00:21:44,066 We don't go in and get all of the interviews. 459 00:21:44,066 --> 00:21:47,033 In New York State for Manhattan, for example, we get it 460 00:21:47,033 --> 00:21:50,033 proportionate to the electorate that's in Manhattan. 461 00:21:50,033 --> 00:21:53,100 So we're trying very hard, but it is more difficult. 462 00:21:53,433 --> 00:21:56,700 And I think people bring a healthy skepticism to the polls. 463 00:21:57,066 --> 00:21:58,200 And that's a good thing. 464 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:03,800 Now, Harris, for example, is talking a lot about her 465 00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:07,300 childcare, expanded childcare credits or 466 00:22:07,500 --> 00:22:10,966 tax credits for small businesses just starting out 467 00:22:12,166 --> 00:22:13,500 and day care. 468 00:22:13,500 --> 00:22:16,666 And are those issues, are those 469 00:22:16,666 --> 00:22:20,066 the kind of issues that do well with women or does? 470 00:22:20,066 --> 00:22:24,533 Is that translated by her followers and her supporters 471 00:22:24,533 --> 00:22:25,900 and would be followers 472 00:22:25,900 --> 00:22:29,633 and supporters into her improving the economy, 473 00:22:29,633 --> 00:22:33,733 the way Trump always talks about improving the economy overall? 474 00:22:33,933 --> 00:22:35,733 Well, it's a big part of the economy, 475 00:22:35,733 --> 00:22:36,866 particularly for women, 476 00:22:36,866 --> 00:22:39,800 and it's increasingly a big part of the economy for men. 477 00:22:40,066 --> 00:22:43,933 And we had the funniest, married men focus group in Michigan, 478 00:22:44,633 --> 00:22:48,266 a while ago, where men said, “I'm a caregiver spouse. 479 00:22:48,266 --> 00:22:50,633 So I get my to-do list every Saturday.” 480 00:22:50,633 --> 00:22:51,466 They do. 481 00:22:51,766 --> 00:22:54,566 And there's now men see that as, “Okay, I got a role 482 00:22:54,566 --> 00:22:56,366 I got to go pick up after prescriptions 483 00:22:56,366 --> 00:22:57,633 for my mother-in-law. 484 00:22:57,633 --> 00:22:59,866 I got to go do this. I got to go. 485 00:22:59,866 --> 00:23:02,233 I got to cover half the day care of the kids sake. 486 00:23:02,233 --> 00:23:04,400 It's my turn to take, stay at home.” 487 00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:06,133 So, and I can tell you, as 488 00:23:06,133 --> 00:23:08,400 an employer, young men are negotiating 489 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:11,533 this just as actively as young women are. 490 00:23:11,533 --> 00:23:13,300 So it's a caregiving. 491 00:23:13,300 --> 00:23:15,733 In cities they are. 492 00:23:15,733 --> 00:23:16,333 Yeah. 493 00:23:16,733 --> 00:23:18,933 Actually, suburban men are pretty big on it. 494 00:23:18,933 --> 00:23:24,033 And, you know, even rural men are intergenerationally focused. 495 00:23:24,033 --> 00:23:26,666 So it's, you know, they don't do the same amount of work. 496 00:23:26,666 --> 00:23:29,666 I mean, one of the funniest questions out there is 497 00:23:29,666 --> 00:23:32,266 we asked men, “Do you do the same amount of 498 00:23:32,266 --> 00:23:35,400 caregiving in home, housework as your spouse?” 499 00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:36,533 And they said, “Absolutely, I do.” 500 00:23:36,533 --> 00:23:38,866 50% of women are like, “Are you kidding? 501 00:23:38,866 --> 00:23:41,933 25% max.” Yeah. 502 00:23:43,033 --> 00:23:47,433 But, the other thing, though, that is really revealing here, 503 00:23:47,766 --> 00:23:51,166 if you ask who would be better on the economy, 504 00:23:51,533 --> 00:23:53,100 Donald Trump is ahead. 505 00:23:53,100 --> 00:23:56,000 Who would be better on bringing jobs to the United States? 506 00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:57,433 Donald Trump is ahead. 507 00:23:57,433 --> 00:24:00,766 If you ask who would be better on the economic well-being 508 00:24:00,766 --> 00:24:04,400 for you and your family, Harris is slightly ahead. 509 00:24:04,666 --> 00:24:07,433 If you would ask, who would be better on dealing 510 00:24:07,433 --> 00:24:10,500 with economics like health care costs? 511 00:24:10,500 --> 00:24:13,733 Harris is much better, so they each have their advantages 512 00:24:14,100 --> 00:24:16,233 in the economic dialogue. 513 00:24:16,233 --> 00:24:19,266 And one of the things that Harris is trying to fix, 514 00:24:19,266 --> 00:24:22,333 and I think she's doing it very ably, is that 515 00:24:22,333 --> 00:24:24,700 people just didn't know her very well. 516 00:24:24,700 --> 00:24:25,666 So they have no idea. 517 00:24:25,666 --> 00:24:28,700 They still dont. Right. 518 00:24:29,233 --> 00:24:32,300 So she's trying to fill in here is my agenda. 519 00:24:32,300 --> 00:24:33,833 It is a new agenda. 520 00:24:33,833 --> 00:24:36,066 It has the focus of my experience 521 00:24:36,066 --> 00:24:39,000 in life with small business and housing and caregiving. 522 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:42,466 And she just, you know, working very hard in advertising 523 00:24:42,466 --> 00:24:46,700 and in every public appearance to get that information out. 524 00:24:46,933 --> 00:24:48,466 She was able to flip her, 525 00:24:48,466 --> 00:24:49,300 I mean, her 526 00:24:49,566 --> 00:24:52,066 approval ratings or favorability ratings are underwater 527 00:24:52,066 --> 00:24:53,066 for a very long time. 528 00:24:53,066 --> 00:24:54,100 She was able to flip them. 529 00:24:54,100 --> 00:24:57,666 But that's partly why her image is still soft 530 00:24:57,666 --> 00:25:00,500 and why some of this electorate is still soft. 531 00:25:00,500 --> 00:25:02,433 But your point on, you know, the different. 532 00:25:02,433 --> 00:25:05,233 I find that interesting because, for example, 533 00:25:05,233 --> 00:25:08,100 she's been much more explicit about what 534 00:25:08,100 --> 00:25:11,100 she's going to do with the tax code, whereas, you know, 535 00:25:12,300 --> 00:25:15,266 Trump was questioned at the New York Economic Club 536 00:25:15,266 --> 00:25:17,466 some weeks ago, asked about how he'd, 537 00:25:17,466 --> 00:25:19,966 you know, what he'd do with child care, how he'd pay for it. 538 00:25:19,966 --> 00:25:23,533 And he rambled off and started talking about tariffs, which, 539 00:25:25,000 --> 00:25:28,733 you know, a lot of economists believe would kill the economy 540 00:25:28,733 --> 00:25:31,900 if he raised, it would be very inflationary 541 00:25:31,900 --> 00:25:35,033 if he raised tariffs the way he's planning to. 542 00:25:35,033 --> 00:25:37,000 So your thoughts on that, Amanda? 543 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:39,966 I think for Trump, there's more of a track record 544 00:25:40,166 --> 00:25:41,166 that he can point to. 545 00:25:41,166 --> 00:25:44,233 And people remember how they felt 546 00:25:44,233 --> 00:25:47,233 and how the economy was for them under Trump. 547 00:25:47,966 --> 00:25:50,700 You know, there's a little bit more of an actual 548 00:25:50,700 --> 00:25:55,000 gut feel for how they and their family were doing. 549 00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:56,666 But as Celinda was talking about in terms of, 550 00:25:56,666 --> 00:25:58,766 you know, which economic measures 551 00:25:58,766 --> 00:26:01,966 Trump is kind of best on, you know, 552 00:26:01,966 --> 00:26:05,100 I think one of the things to remember is that the way 553 00:26:05,100 --> 00:26:08,566 men and women view the economy is also different. 554 00:26:08,833 --> 00:26:09,966 How so? 555 00:26:09,966 --> 00:26:13,000 Men often look at the economy and how well the economy 556 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:16,000 is doing by the incoming, 557 00:26:16,600 --> 00:26:19,833 the income for families, so the wages and jobs. 558 00:26:19,833 --> 00:26:21,266 And women are looking at it 559 00:26:21,266 --> 00:26:24,033 in terms of the outgoing expenditures. 560 00:26:24,033 --> 00:26:28,933 So inflation, and prices are really hitting for women. 561 00:26:29,266 --> 00:26:31,900 And so one of the things that you're really seeing is, 562 00:26:31,900 --> 00:26:35,166 an education or socioeconomic gap for women. 563 00:26:35,466 --> 00:26:38,300 So I don't think Trump is really going to be targeting 564 00:26:38,300 --> 00:26:41,600 winning over college educated women. 565 00:26:41,833 --> 00:26:42,866 Now, there are some spots 566 00:26:42,866 --> 00:26:44,966 where he'll be able to on a safety issue. 567 00:26:44,966 --> 00:26:45,866 And that's how Republicans 568 00:26:46,100 --> 00:26:49,433 were able to do so well in places like New York in 2022, 569 00:26:50,066 --> 00:26:53,266 but in places like Wisconsin and Michigan and Arizona, 570 00:26:53,266 --> 00:26:53,766 what he's going to be 571 00:26:54,433 --> 00:26:57,200 focusing on are kind of women without college degrees. 572 00:26:57,500 --> 00:26:58,733 And those are the women that, 573 00:26:58,733 --> 00:27:01,033 you know, over the last four years have had to decide 574 00:27:01,033 --> 00:27:05,300 whether to put gas in the car or food on the table at times. 575 00:27:05,300 --> 00:27:07,966 So that kind of economic stress 576 00:27:07,966 --> 00:27:10,966 has been really front and center for them. 577 00:27:11,333 --> 00:27:15,133 And they remember that under the Trump administration, 578 00:27:15,133 --> 00:27:18,133 they didn't have that kind of same economic stress. 579 00:27:18,500 --> 00:27:20,800 And that's really what he's focusing on. 580 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:24,166 Thank you both for joining us, pollsters Celinda Lake 581 00:27:24,166 --> 00:27:27,266 and Amanda Iovino. That's it for this edition. 582 00:27:27,266 --> 00:27:30,400 Keep the conversation going on all our social media 583 00:27:30,400 --> 00:27:33,833 platforms and visit our website: 584 00:27:35,533 --> 00:27:38,533 And whether you agree or think to the contrary, 585 00:27:38,733 --> 00:27:39,466 see you next week. 586 00:27:57,300 --> 00:28:00,866 Funding for “To the Contrary,” provided by: